Latest Developments

 

05/05/2017 Back To List
The New UNESCO Resolution & Jerusalem

On May 3, UNESCO adopted a decision relating to the Occupied Territories, including a section on Jerusalem. The official text is here. Ten countries voted against the resolution: the US, the UK, Italy, the Netherlands, Lithuania, Greece, Paraguay, Ukraine, Togo, and Germany.

 

What was Israel’s position vis-a-vis the resolution?

 

Like the UNESCO text of October 2016, this text was vehemently rejected and condemned by Israel, among other things for failing to recognize Israeli sovereignty in Jerusalem; denying Israel’s ties to Jerusalem; for failing to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital; for calling Israel an occupying power in Jerusalem; and for failing to explicitly articulate the Jewish connection to Jerusalem.

 

This Israeli response to the text is cynically manipulative and intentionally misleading, and in most cases attributes things to the text that simply are not there. It is of course noteworthy that NO country recognizes Israel’s sovereignty in Jerusalem – its status is to be determined; no country recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel – this too will be part of a permanent status agreement; and calling Israel an occupying power in East Jerusalem is a factually correct term for Israel’s presence there, under international law and consistent with longstanding international consensus.

 

Moreover, while all these points are correct, they are actually beside the point.

 

·       The resolution contains no mention of any sovereignty in Jerusalem whatsoever – the issue simply doesn’t arise.

·       There is no mention of any capital in Jerusalem, and the omission is entirely compatible with the nature and substance of the text.

·       Nowhere is there a denial of Jewish ties to Jerusalem or the other holy sites, and on the two occasions when any mention is made of religious attachments the text is scrupulously egalitarian, dignified and using terminology acceptable to all stakeholders, Jews, Christians and Muslims alike: the two cursory mentions of religious attachments in the document occur where the resolution reaffirms “the importance of the Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls for the three monotheistic religions” and states Al-Haram Al-Ibrahimi/Tomb of the Patriarchs in Al- Khalil/Hebron and the Bilal Ibn Rabah Mosque/Rachel’s Tomb “are of religious significance for Judaism, Christianity and Islam.”

 

In short, the Israeli attacks on the resolution do not merely misconstrue the actual text, they are blatant and willful falsehoods.

 

How does this new resolution compare to the previous ones?

 

·       First, as noted in our previous reporting on UNESCO resolutions and Jerusalem, UNESCO has been passing resolutions related to Jerusalem every year since 2004. These resolutions have never included any reference to Jewish (or Christian) equities in Jerusalem; the language of the 2016 resolution was consistent with the customary language dating back more than a decade (and until 2016 not a source of controversy).

 

·       As we also noted previously, from 2004-2008, the language of the resolutions overall was relatively anodyne, consistent with a mostly stable status quo in Jerusalem. Starting in 2009 – coinciding with the assumption of power of the Netanyahu government and the assumption of local authority by Mayor Nir Barkat, and continuing with the admission of Palestine as a UNESCO member in 2011 – the language of the resolution became progressively longer, and more polemical, in parallel to changes in Israeli policies in relation to Jerusalem, its Old City and Haram al-Sharif/the Temple Mount.  As a result, over time these resolutions, including the May 2017 version, have come to resemble more a polemical manifesto than a responsible effort to genuinely address the legitimate concerns raised about the challenges undermining the status and uniqueness of Jerusalem. That being said, claims that the resolutions have in the past denied Jewish connections to Jerusalem in general and to the Temple Mount in particular are simply false.

 

·       In this context, the latest resolution included changes that could have been viewed as victories for Israel. For example, the main point on which Israel focused its anger in the October 2016 resolution was the text’s usage of Islamic terminology with respect to Jerusalem’s holiest site (referred to in the resolution as the al Aqsa Mosque and Haram el Sharif) rather than (or in addition to) using the Jewish terminology (the Temple Mount). This choice of terminology was portrayed by Israel as UNESCO legitimizing Muslim claims in the city and ignoring or delegitimizing Jewish claims. In the May 2017 resolution, in contrast, this battle over terminology was resolved by removing the relevant passage – in effect, refraining from employing terminology specific to any stakeholder. The fact that this change in the text was ignored/dismissed by Israel as irrelevant validates the conclusion that Israeli outrage over the resolution has less to do with the actual text and more to do with political gamesmanship.

 

·       Similar to one version of the resolution of October 2016, the text refers to the importance of the Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls “for the three monotheistic religions Similarly, it states that Al-Haram al Ibrāhīmī/Tomb of the Patriarchs in Al-Khalīl/Hebron and the Bilāl ibn Rabāḥ Mosque/Rachel’s Tomb  are of religious significance for Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Consequently, it cannot be claimed that the resolution denies Jewish attachments. Moreover, the omission of specific reference to the Jewish attachment to the Temple Mount is qualitatively less egregious given the non-inclusion in this resolution of any parallel embrace of Islamic ties (that is, the removal of reference to Al Aqsa/Haram al Sharif).

 

How did the changes in the resolution come about?

 

Reportedly, Germany played a leading role in getting changes in the language of this resolution (changes that Israel might have been expected to welcome), and in building a supporting coalition composed of leading European and Arab States. In spite of this effort, Israeli officials launched an in-your-face offensive targeting Germany for these efforts. In the end, twenty-two countries voted in favor of the resolution: Russia, China, Brazil, Sweden, South Africa, Iran, Malaysia, Mauritius, Nigeria, Senegal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Vietnam, Nicaragua, Chad and seven Arab countries. Ten countries voted against the resolution, Ultimately, both Israeli and U.S. pressure convinced 9 countries to join the United States in voting against the resolution: Germany, Italy, Great Britain, Holland, Lithuania, Greece, Paraguay, Ukraine and Togo.

 

What was Israel’s reaction to the passage of the new resolution?

 

Initially, the Israeli reaction to the draft resolution was both sober and reasonable. Foreign Ministry officials went so far as calling in a diplomatic breakthrough (see here), pointing out that Israel’s diplomatic efforts had borne fruit. While Israel continued to note that the text remained problematic, pride was taken in the fact that most egregious language had been removed.

 

While there were no significant distinctions between the draft resolution in which Israel took pride and the version ultimately adopted, the Israeli reaction to the latter was very different. The conclusion is inescapable: the attack on the resolution was a premeditated, calculated move to discredit both UNESCO and those who refuse to swallow Israel’s hasbara line about just how idyllic the situation is in Jerusalem. This specious attack – and the attack on those who refuse to unequivocally oppose the resolution – makes clear that Netanyahu prefers picking a fight to solving a problem. Indeed, based on his reaction it is conceivable that he would have preferred UNESCO to have adopted a genuinely toxic text, so as to more easily permitted him to play the outraged, self-righteous victim. Deprived of that easy opportunity by sober, reasonable changes made in the drafting process, Netanyahu elected to simply pretend that the text was something that it was not – preferring to play to his hardline domestic base by picking a fight with an ally like Germany, rather than commending that ally for successfully working to improve the text, to Israel’s benefit.

 

In addition, the Israeli government lashed out in various ways that went beyond the attack on a text that doesn’t exist:

 

·       Far-right Israeli Minister of Culture and Sport, Miri Regev, called for immediately closing down the UNESCO office in Jerusalem – notwithstanding the fact that UNESCO does not have an office in Jerusalem (Regev apparently does not know the difference between UNESCO and UNSCO – the office of the UN Special Envoy for the Middle East Peace, which has nothing to do with UNESCO, and indeed maintains a compound in Jerusalem).

·       The Israeli Foreign Ministry summoned Sweden’s Ambassador to reprimand him for his country’s vote in UNESCO. An Israeli official dismissed Sweden’s explanation of its vote as “a masterpiece of hypocrisy, playing skillfully with nasty anti-Israel propaganda.” It is noteworthy that no similar summons was issued to other countries that supported the resolution, such as Russia, Brazil and China. In Netanyahu’s UNESCO passion play, it is Sweden that has been cast in the exclusive role of the pre-ordained, metaphysical anti-Semite.

·       Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu announced that Israel would cut its payments to the UN over the “delusional” vote in UNESCO. As noted in JPost: “This money is in addition to $2 million Israel said it would withhold from the UN after the passage in March of anti-Israel resolutions at the UN Human Rights Council, and $6m. that Jerusalem slashed in January in the aftermath of the passage of anti-settlement resolution 2334 in the UN Security Council. Following these cuts, Israel will contribute only $2.7m this year to the UN, instead of the $11.7m that was originally earmarked.” Haaretz reported Barak Ravid tweeted later that “An Israeli official told me further cuts might lead to Israel losing its voting right in UN institutions.”

 

Any additional conclusions about this UNESCO drama?

 

The complex and sensitive issues regarding the management of Jerusalem’s precious sacred and historical heritage sites clearly falls under the purview of UNESCO, and these classic heritage issues have, in Jerusalem, far-reaching geopolitical ramifications. The past and current UNESCO resolutions regarding Jerusalem’s Old City deal, for the most part, with subjects of genuine concern, real problems that regrettably are dealt with by means of language that is often inflammatory and polemical. Neither the religious and historical integrity of Jerusalem, nor the equities of the stakeholders, have been well served by these resolutions.

 

It is long overdue that UNESCO approve a sober, lucid, and pragmatic resolution regarding Jerusalem’s Old City, which is compatible with both the norms and values of UNESCO and the provisions of international law. Israel is indeed the occupying power in East Jerusalem, but the occupier has not only obligations under international law, but powers and responsibilities as well – as do the religious and cultural institutions, such as the Waqf, under Israeli rule. Such a resolution would articulate a nuanced approach to Jerusalem in all its complexity and multiplicity. It would offer clarity regarding the terms of engagement that are mandated by widely accepted norms pertaining to heritage sites, and by the provisions of international law. It would create clear and achievable benchmarks which would protect not only the cultural integrity of the city, but be a major force of stabilization in the ever-volatile Jerusalem.

 

Framing and approving such a resolution is both essential and achievable.

 

Regrettably, likely that if/when such a resolution is adopted by UNESCO, Netanyahu will lead a well-orchestrated chorus of feigned outrage over the text, which will likely have no bearing on what the resolution actually says, or how what it says relates to the realities on the ground. Given the chance to score cheap points in the arena of hasbara, it is unlikely that Netanyahu will be allow himself to be burdened by the facts.

3/10/2017 Imminent Threat: Green Light for Givat Hamatos

 


3/10/2017 Imminent Threat: Potential War Crime; de facto Annexation and New Settlement Construction (Ma’ale Adumim/E-1)

 


3/10/2017 Uptick is Settlement Displacements: Shamasneh Family Evicted

 


3/10/2017 Expansion of Nof Zion on the Agenda

 


10/8/2017 Netanyahu Unshackled: New and dangerous terms of engagement in Jerusalem

 


10/8/2017 The Latest Temple Mt/Haram al-Sharif Crisis: A Provisional Post-Mortem

 


10/8/2017 Pending Jerusalem Legislative Initiatives: Strategic Shifts in Current Status & Potential Political Future of Jerusalem

 


10/8/2017 East Jerusalem Settlements -- APPROVED

 


21/7/2017 Major New Crisis on the Temple Mount/Haram al Sharif

 


21/7/2017 New Life for Major Settlement Plan to Connect Adam (West Bank) to EJ's Neve Yaacov

 


21/7/2017 Proposed Amendment of Jerusalem Basic Law

 


21/7/2017 UNESCO’s Resolution on Hebron

 


5/7/2017 The Settlement Floodgates Have Been Opened

 


5/6/2017 Trump Signs Waiver, Postponing Embassy Move

 


5/6/2017 Trump Visit & Jerusalem Day: Before, During, & After

 


5/6/2017 Cabinet Approves Projects for Old City, Historic Basin, & East Jerusalem (Inside the Barrier)

 


5/6/2017 Jordan's Growing Discontent with Israeli Provocations Over the Temple Mount/al-Haram al-Sharif

 


5/6/2017 Danny Seidemann in Haaretz: Trump Exposed the Fantasy of Netanyahu's 'Undivided Jerusalem'

 


5/5/2017 URGENT/BREAKING NEWS: Imminent Tenders for Givat Hamatos

 


5/5/2017 Imminent Announcements: Atarot & Ramat Shlomo

 


5/5/2017 New Settler “Visitors’ Center” in Ras El Amud

 


5/5/2017 The New UNESCO Resolution & Jerusalem

 


28/3/2017 Working Toward a New US-Israel Understanding on Settlements

 


28/3/2017 Tensions Growing [again] Focused on Temple Mount/Haram al Sharif

 


28/3/2017 Palestinian Residency Rights: Important Court Ruling

 


24/2/2017 Limiting Settlement Construction to the "Blocs" - Implications for Jerusalem

 


24/2/2017 To Move, or Not to Move (the Embassy), That is the Question

 


24/2/2017 Paving the way for annexation?

 


24/2/2017 Work Starting on Eastern Ring Road?

 


24/1/2017 East Jerusalem Settlement Activity & the Onset of the Trump Era: What to Watch

 


5/1/2017 Moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem: A Hard Look at the Arguments & Implications

 


14/12/2016 Update on Israeli Govt-Proposed Law to Muzzle Muslim Call to Prayer

 


14/12/2016 Rumors & Lobbying Around Possible US Embassy Relocation to Jerusalem

 


14/12/2016 Netanyahu Rejects Police Recommendations to Tweak Temple Mt Status Quo

 


14/12/2016 Batan al-Hawa - New B'tselem Report on Settler Activities

 


14/12/2016 Final Approval of Gilo Expansion - 770 New Units (Mordot Gilo South)

 


30/11/2016 Insights/analysis on UNESCO resolutions on the Old City & its Walls

 


30/11/2016 Re: Reported Demolitions at Jerusalem's Bab Al-Rahma Cemetery

 


30/11/2016 Plan to Connect Tel Aviv to the Western Wall

 


30/11/2016 2016 Jewish High Holidays: Record number of Jewish visitors on Temple Mount/Haram El Sharif

 


28/11/2016 The American Role: Interregnum & Post-January 20, 2016

 


28/11/2016 Ban on Mosque Morning Call to Prayer

 


28/11/2016 Turning Jeruasalem Palestinians into “Human Shields” Against Outpost Evacuations

 


28/11/2016 Announcement of Construction Plan in Mordot Gilo

 


28/11/2016 OCHA report: 180 Palestinian households at risks of eviction in East Jerusalem

 


28/11/2016 Approval of 500 units in Ramat Shlomo

 


28/11/2016 State Comptroller’s Report on Elad

 


30/9/2016 On the Eve of the New Year – A Different & Dangerous Jerusalem

 


15/8/2016 Government Actively Advancing E-2

 


15/8/2016 Back in the Headlines: Plans for 2500 Units South of Gilo

 


15/8/2016 Tisha B'Av Incitement Re: The Temple Mount

 


15/8/2016 Deepening the Occupation in East Jerusalem

 


5/8/2016 Settlement Announcements - July 2016

 


5/8/2016 The Uptick in East Jerusalem Demolitions

 


5/8/2016 Israeli Govt: "The Mt of Olives will be Reinforced as a Visitors' Site"

 


5/8/2016 Ma'ale Adumim Annexation bill

 


8/7/2016 Full Analysis of the Latest East Jerusalem Announcements/Approvals

 


28/6/2016 A new settlement enclave in Silwan – Batan al Hawa

 


28/6/2016 ?The end of quiet on the Temple Mount/Haram al Sharif

 


28/6/2016 The Wrong Way to Divide Jerusalem

 


3/6/2016 Proposed Annexation of Maale Adumim

 


3/6/2016 East Jerusalem: Emerging Patterns

 


2/6/2016 Keeping a Close Eye on the Temple Mount/Haram al Sharif

 


22/1/2016 Church Attacked (Again) in Jerusalem

 


22/1/2016 Herzog proposes De-Annexing Some Parts of East Jerusalem

 


30/12/2015 Revealed in Newly-Released Documents: Massive Planning Advancing for Settlements

 


29/12/2015 Understanding "Status Quo" on the Temple Mount/Haram al Sharif

 


9/11/2015 What's Been Going On in Jerusalem? Danny Seidemann Analysis

 


9/11/2015 What's Going On? Senior IDF Officials Weigh In.

 


9/11/2015 Recent East Jerusalem Settlement Developments

 


9/11/2015 East Jerusalem Security Situation - by the numbers

 


9/11/2015 EJ Security Situation - Plans to Revoke Palestinians' Residency?

 


9/11/2015 EJ Security Situation - Security Measures on the Ground

 


9/11/2015 EJ Security Situation - Home Demolitions

 


22/9/2015 Jerusalem & the Temple Mount: A New Dangerous Escalation

 


13/8/2015 Imminent New Settlement Enclave in Silwan

 


13/8/2015 E. Jerusalem (partial) Settlement Freeze May Soon Defrost

 


13/8/2015 Troubling Developments on the Temple Mount/Haram al Sharif

 


22/5/2015 What We Can Learn from Jerusalem Day 2015

 


22/5/2015 Latest Settlement Tenders in East Jerusalem - Ramat Shlomo & Givat Zeev

 


22/5/2015 ?E-1 Looming

 


22/5/2015 East Jerusalem Simmers

 


29/4/2015 New & Recycled East Jerusalem Settlement Tenders

 


29/4/2015 High Court Rules on Absentee Property Law in Jerusalem

 


29/4/2015 Good News: IDF Colleges NOT Moving to Mount of Olives; Holy Basin Cable Car Plan Stalled

 


29/4/2015 Approval (but only sort of) of New Palestinian Construction in East Jerusalem

 


29/4/2015 Some Palestinian Cars Allowed in East Jerusalem

 


29/4/2015 Palestinian Security Forces (not really) allowed in East Jerusalem

 


14/1/2015 East Jerusalem at the Beginning of 2015: Things to Watch

 


3/11/2014 Attempted Assassination Raises the Stakes at the Temple Mount

 


3/11/2014 Reasons Behind Escalating Temple Mount Crisis

 


3/11/2014 Bibi's New Settlement Initiative - Ramat Shlomo & Har Homa

 


3/11/2014 More Settler Takeovers in Another Part of Silwan

 


2/10/2014 Netanyahu Cannot Evade Responsibility for Givat Hamatos Approval & Silwan Takeovers

 


1/10/2014 Breaking & Urgent News: Givat Hamatos Approved

 


30/9/2014 Major Development: In Overnight Operation, Settlers Take Over Multiple Buildings in Silwan

 


18/9/2014 Specter of E-1 Raised by Plan to Relocate Bedouin

 


18/9/2014 Looming Crisis in East Jerusalem - Givat Hamatos

 


17/9/2014 East Jerusalem Clashes Continue

 


9/9/2014 East Jerusalem Aflame

 


4/9/2014 The Real Story about those new units "approved" for Palestinians in East Jerusalem

 


26/8/2014 Gilo Tenders Awarded, but (for now) EJ Settlement Freeze Continues

 


19/5/2014 Jerusalem Settlements - The (Proximate, Contributing) Cause of the Collapse

 


19/5/2014 Post-Collapse - De Facto Freeze in East Jerusalem, But the Lull Won’t Last

 


19/5/2014 Are We Sliding Toward Religious War? A Brief Survey of Key Jerusalem Developments/Trends

 


5/3/2014 Framework Language and Jerusalem: Gimmicks Are NOT the Answer

 


5/3/2014 New Israeli Yeshiva Approved...in Downtown Sheikh Jarrah

 


5/3/2014 Playing with Fire, Part 2: Elad Set to Gain Control of Area Adjacent to the Temple Mt/Haram al Sharif

 


5/3/2014 Playing with Fire, Part 1: Debating the Status Quo on the Temple Mount

 


3/3/2014 Demolition orders in E-1

 


9/1/2014 New Seidemann Op-Ed in the Guardian: The myth of an undivided Jerusalem is collapsing under its own weight

 


12/12/2013 Danny Seidemann Injured by Stone-Thrower - Condition Update & Comment

 


12/12/2013 East Jerusalem Settlements since the Resumption of Talks: the Facts & their Implications

 


12/12/2013 The [Apparent] Re-Emergence of the “Greater Jerusalem” Gimmick

 


12/12/2013 Post-Script: Those Planning Tenders for 24,000 New Settlement Units

 


27/8/2013 Ramat Shlomo Back in the Headlines

 


27/8/2013 Funding Approved for Settler-Run Projects in Silwan and Jebel Mukabber

 


27/8/2013 Three Palestinians Killed by Israeli Forces in Qalandia RC

 


27/8/2013 ?Uptick in East Jerusalem Home Demolitions

 


19/8/2013 Pyromaniacs Target the Temple Mount

 


19/8/2013 Jerusalem Residency Concerns Resurface

 


19/8/2013 New Pro-Settlement Guidelines on Absentee Property Law

 


19/8/2013 A U.S. Court Rules on Jerusalem

 


16/8/2013 Timeline/details of Recent Jerusalem-Related Settlement Developments

 


16/8/2013 Bibi, Settlements & Peace Talks -- Analysis

 


13/6/2013 The A-Zayyem/Mount of Olives Interchange, Plan 14049

 


13/6/2013 Tenders Awarded for Ramot Expansion, Additional Tenders for Mordot Gilo

 


13/6/2013 Everything You Need to Know About Jerusalem & the Absentee Property Law

 


7/5/2013 The IDF Colleges on the Mt. of Olives Off the Agenda, Again

 


7/5/2013 Plans Published for Old City Cable Car

 


7/5/2013 Sharansky Plan Hits a Wall, no pun intended

 


7/5/2013 The Wall/Barrier vs. Cremisan & Beit Jala

 


5/5/2013 Spatial Shaping in J'lem Continues with Opening of Route 20

 


24/4/2013 Concerns about Proposed “Solution” to Women’s Prayer Issue at the Western Wall

 


22/4/2013 The Politics of Waste Treatment in East Jerusalem

 


15/4/2013 Fifty New Units in East Talpiot

 


14/1/2013 E-1/Bab ash-Shams: What Happened, What it Means, What Next

 


28/12/2012 Mordot Gilo South - APPROVED

 


19/12/2012 Givat Hamatos APPROVED - What it Means

 


17/12/2012 Breaking News - Approvals this week - Ramat Shlomo & Givat Hamatos

 


5/12/2012 The E-1 Crisis...This Is Not a Drill

 


6/11/2012 More than 1200 New Tenders Issued for Pisgat Ze'ev and Ramot

 


31/10/2012 New Construction Approved in Har Homa

 


30/10/2012 New East Jerusalem Settlement Construction Approved - East Talpiot units for Israeli Security Personnel

 


24/10/2012 Mordot Gilo Construction Approved

 


24/10/2012 Plans for IDF Colleges on Mt. of Olives Deposited for Public Review & Explanation of Location

 


24/10/2012 Taking the Garbage to East Jerusalem

 


24/10/2012 Is the Palestinian Population of East Jerusalem Becoming More Israeli -- No

 


24/10/2012 Pisgat Zeev in the News

 


18/10/2012 Crisis Brewing on the Temple Mount

 


17/9/2012 Jerusalem, Netanyahu and the two-state solution

 


16/9/2012 Issue to watch: East Jerusalem Home Demolitions

 


16/9/2012 Attacks on Palestinians in Jerusalem – Sign of the “Hebronization” of the City

 


16/9/2012 Jerusalem in the Headlines: Ras al-Amud, Temple Mount, the Barrier, Elad, & Har Homa

 


15/9/2012 Jerusalem: Political Football in U.S. Presidential Race

 


14/9/2012 In Memorium: Our Friend, Chris Stevens

 


2/7/2012 New Tenders Published for East Jerusalem Settlement Construction

 


2/7/2012 Plans for New IDF War College on the Mt. of Olives Approved for Public Review

 


11/6/2012 Settlement Surge Continues on Jerusalem's Southern Flank

 


8/5/2012 Arab VIPs Start Coming to Jerusalem

 


7/5/2012 Givat Hamatos – Nearing the Point-of-No-Return

 


7/5/2012 IDF College on the Mt. of Olives – Moving Forward

 


7/5/2012 Kidmat Tzion – Municipal Approval Anticipated Soon

 


7/5/2012 Mughrabi Ramp – Some Good News

 


6/5/2012 Beit Hanina Settlement Effort Continues

 


10/4/2012 Late Winter Freeze in East Jerusalem turns to Spring Thaw

 


8/4/2012 Kidmat Tziyon Settlement Scheme to be Expedited

 


8/4/2012 New East Jerusalem “Park” Soon to get Final Approval

 


8/4/2012 New Settlement in Beit Hanina?

 


8/4/2012 Israeli High Court Rejects Shepherd’s Hotel Appeal

 


14/3/2012 Will Arab & Muslim Leaders Start Coming to Jerusalem?


 


14/3/2012 A Major East Jerusalem Settlement Plan Comes Back to Life

 


14/3/2012 Spotlight on Jewish Access to the Temple Mount

 


14/3/2012 Volatility in Silwan: Mini-Intifada Continues, Cave-Ins, and New Settler Plans

 


9/1/2012 The Ongoing Settlement Surge in East Jerusalem

 


9/1/2012 The Mughrabi Gate Saga - Update

 


10/12/2011 Barkat Tries to Force Mughrabi Ramp Demolition

 


9/12/2011 Approval of Mount Scopus "Park" Proceeds

 


13/10/2011 Approval for New Israeli Settlement at Givat Hamatos Proceeds

 


12/10/2011 New Pisgat Ze'ev Building Permits

 


28/9/2011 New Settlement Approval issued for Gilo - Plan 13261

 


11/8/2011 More Jerusalem Settlement Approvals: Ramat Shlomo, Pisgat Zeev, Givat Hamatos

 


10/8/2011 Yet Another Har Homa Plan Approved (No. 12825) - Public Buildings, 50 Units

 


5/8/2011 Har Homa C Plan 10310 (app. 983 units) Approved

 


9/7/2011 Jerusalem Municipal "Approval" of Mordot Gilo Plan

 


9/7/2011 Meretz Rejoins Municipal Coalition - Separate Portfolios for EJ Settlers and Palestinians

 


20/6/2011 The Ramat Shlomo House Extension Plans

 


10/6/2011 Committee for Acceleration of (EJ) Construction to Convene on June 14

 


24/5/2011 Netanyahu Approves East Jerusalem Construction Hours Before Obama Address

 


24/5/2011 Barkat Trying to Force Netanyahu's Hand on Mughrabi Ramp

 


12/5/2011 The Non-Existent Court Decision on Bustan Demolitions

 


10/5/2011 New East Jerusalem Settlements Update

 


9/5/2011 US Supreme Court to Hear Jerusalem Status Case

 


21/4/2011 Is There a De Facto Settlement Freeze in East Jerusalem? The Facts

 


18/4/2011 April Surge in East Jerusalem Construction Plans

 


18/4/2011 Mount Scopus Slopes Park Approved for Public Review

 


16/3/2011 Permit Issued for 14 Units at Ras el Amud Police Station

 


16/3/2011 Permit Issued for Mughrabi Ramp

 

29/7/2013 A Layman's Guide to Jerusalem House Demolitions
Daniel Seidemann

 


29/7/2013 A Laymen's Guide to the Planning Process in Jerusalem.pdf
Daniel Seidmann

 


20/3/2013 "Spatial Shaping", the Ross Agenda and a Partial Settlement Freeze
Daniel Seidmann

 


10/3/2013 Spatial Shaping - Unilaterally Determining Israel’s Base-Line Border
Daniel Seidmann

 


10/9/2012 NOREF Policy Brief August 2012 | By Daniel Seidemann
Daniel Seidemann

 


30/1/2012 East Jerusalem and the Imminent Demise of the Two-State Solution
Daniel Seidemann

 


7/11/2011 East Jerusalem Developments and Trends: 2006-2011
Daniel Seidemann

 


31/10/2011 The TJ Guide to the Planning and Construction Process in East Jerusalem - Oct. 2011
Daniel Seidemann

 


15/10/2011 Givat Hamatos/Mordot Gilo: New Settlement Schemes on Jerusalem's Southern Flank
Daniel Seidemann

 


12/8/2011 U.S. (non)-Recognition of Sovereignty in Jerusalem: A Consistent Policy, 1948 - 2011
Lara Friedman

 


1/8/2011 Hanging On By Our Fingernails
Daniel Seidemann

 


22/2/2011 Jerusalem Challenges the API
Daniel Seidemann

 


21/2/2011 East Jerusalem settlers and Israel's never-ending War of Independence
Daniel Seidemann

 


20/2/2011 The Two Jerusalems
D. Seidemann D.Rothem

 


19/2/2011 Jerusalem on the Brink
Daniel Seidemann

 


19/2/2011 A barely tolerated minority
Daniel Seidemann

 


17/2/2011 Redeeming Jerusalem by truth, not hollow slogans
Daniel Seidemann

 


16/2/2011 Jerusalem, settlements, and the "everybody knows" fallacy
Lara Friedman - Daniel Seidemann

 


15/2/2011 Blogposts
Lara Friedman
 
 
http://www.sayarch.com/